Darwin’s Evolution theory: Now think if it’s a failure
72If you haven’t read my hubs on thinking or thought process, please do read before reading this hub. It will be a kind of backup to make your mind awake and active to think.
We all know, following science and their evidences, all around the technologies and invention. Any one could go blind to follow seeing this scientific development any theory which is presented with some reasonable logic. Yet our science is not complete. But some theories propounded earlier could be a subject of revision.
For example: evolution theory by Darwin. Even a kid is taught in school about it. And he makes a firm believe that our ancestors were monkeys. This theory was given by Darwin in 1859 in his book “origin of species”.
About Evolution theory: let’s revise before criticizing the points made in this theory. It argues that all the plants, trees, worms, animals are formed from amoeba. Which is formed after the development of some micro-organism like bacteria? And from one category of worm known as water worm, fish originated, followed by further origination of frog, reptiles, birds, mammals etc.All this happened about 600 millions ago.
After a long time since this happened, the origination of archbishop took place. These are all mammals like apes, monkeys. They use to eat fruits. And this happened about 70 million years ago. They followed then a step by step development of monkeys, apes, gorillas, chimpanzees, following the time span of 40-20-8-5 million years ago respectively.
That means about 5 million years ago, after the origination of the chimpanzees a drastic change occurred. The backbone got straight from semi erect state and legs arms were also edited accordingly. And lastly Hominids appeared 4 million years ago. They could walk on 2 legs straightly.
Then Homo erectus followed by Homo sapiens appeared, the modern man, about
1, 00,000 years ago. Then you know the story of how they use to hunt, make use of fire, and other tools for there daily uses. This is Evolution theory propounded by Darwin.
EXTRACTS:
Let’s clear our thought process before thinking rationally into it.
1) The theory argues, fish or water worms transformed into frogs after certain development means they have now breathing capacity on land.
2) From frog, reptiles originated like, lizards, snake and crocodile. But because as they were very slow further development occurred and they developed into dinosaurs, first small and then huge sized.
3) Of about 130 million years ago fossil found, in Germany and near by London, it was said that the fossil was of a shape of a present crow with wings, two legs with some 350grams of weight. And as its face was like a dinosaur and teeth like a dinosaur. The theorist beliefs that the dinosaurs were developed into crows or birds. And further we fine small and sweet humming birds, resulting from a contraction. What a development?
4) So birds are formed from frog in short according to Darwin.
5) Again theory argues that some animals when developed from ground and exposed to sea water, they converted into whales and dolphins.
6) Cat became tiger and lion. But some remain short and are cat still. Strange!
7) A skeleton was being found 50 million year old look like a big dog like animal. It was the ancestor of all donkeys, horses, zebras and all other alike animals.
NOW THINK ABOUT IT:
Now when e had gone through the entire theory, lets think about it rationally or scientifically or technically:
1) Evolution process can’t develop senses, then how micro organism developed into those which have senses. It can’t see the outside world and then it converts to a being that can see how? And the organism that does not have bones, transformed into bone having beings, how? They argue that due to some physical labor they got bones. But through physical exercise muscled could go hard, it can’t be converted into bones. Further they ague that some veins and nerves collectively formed bones a s happens when our teeth fall, in childhood another comes. But again, if teeth falls further then no teeth comes. Do we lack veins and nerves now? Ha-ha…
2) The human evolved from a process following monkeys, gorilla, chimpanzees and soon. But any change can’t be happen in one day. It takes time. None monkey had given birth to a gorilla to start with new species. And we find fossils of monkey and gorilla, but we cant find the fossils of that slow change how it occurred ( I mean the tail of money could had been shorten over years slowly), but no evidence yet, why?
3) Humans are formed long back, still why the development stopped? Are we complete? Why we are not being transformed to more developed ones?
4) A species had a very narrow margin of DNA alteration technically, so its not possible to create new species. Yes multiples of same kind could be possible.
Further you can find 100’s of question to rise on Evolution theory of Darwin. Just think as not only man but also in other creatures we don’t see any development at present. Think!!!!
what do you think, Darwin
See results without votingvote upvote downshareprintflag
- Useful (1)
- Funny
- Awesome (1)
- Beautiful (1)
- Interesting (2)
CommentsLoading...
You have obviously never read the Origin of Species to say something like "The human evolved from a process following monkeys, gorilla, chimpanzees and soon" - this is NOT HOW evolution works. What you have just described are different branches of evolution - not some random gorilla giving birth to a chimpanzee. The senses didn't just pop out of nowhere either - look at how photosensitive cells developed over time to create the eyes...
You should research the topic before submitting this to people who may believe your 'revolutionary' way of thinking.
We can stay here and argue about evolution and how man kind came to exist all day. The thing is we'll most likely never know the truth. The only thing we know for certain is that Darwin was not right, because his theory has never been proven. After all these years, it still remains only a THEORY, not a scientific fact. There are so many different theories out there with just as much evidence and they can sound just as convincing and as persuasive as Darwin's. However, they receive little to no recognition. Soon, someone will come up with a new theory which will send Darwin's out of the equation. People who defend Darwin's theory with such passion are simply ignorant. Let me remind you that people believed in the Bible's story of creation for thousands of years before Darwin's theory came along. So to say that he has it all figured out and to stop questioning his theory is the dumbest thing we could possibly say or do. We need to keep looking and maybe, just maybe, one day in the future we might be able to figure out where exactly we came from.
Great Hub. Really enjoyed it. Keep up the great work.
Of course evolution isn't an absolute certainty (saying nothing is certain leads to a pointless philosophical debate) but it is SCIENTIFIC FACT. There are huge amounts of evidence out there and as yet no convincing argument against it or for any alternatives (feel free to show me any other 'theory' that has more evidence and show me how I'm being ignorant). The problem is that some people don't even look at the evidence and say - yeah its only a theory, we can't know anything for sure. The people who actually take time to read the Origin of Species (including many people of religious faith, with the current pope saying "there is much scientific proof in favor of evolution, which appears as a reality that we must see". I'm not arguing against faith, just 'passionately' saying being passionate about evolution isn't ignorance.
LOL
"Let me remind you that people believed in the Bible's story of creation for thousands of years before Darwin's theory came along."
That sentence alone proves that being passionate about an unproven subject is ignorant. And no, the theory of evolution is not a SCIENTIFIC FACT. Maybe in your world, but not out here in reality. It is the most ACCEPTED THEORY. Keyword here is theory buddy.
I don't seem to understand why people bring up faith every time the theory of evolution is being questioned. I am an atheist and I dislike religion.
klevifusha, there is a difference. People believed in the Biblical creation as a result of trying to make sense of things for which there was no scientific understanding. The theory of evolution came about as a result of methodical research, unbiased observation and experimentation. And you are wrong. In as much as anything can be described as fact, the theory of evolution is a fact. The amount of evidence for it - fossil, genetic, anatomical, physiological, etc - is overwhelming. The only thing that is in doubt is the precise nature of the influences which have most effect on evolution, and how rapidly they bring about change, assisted by mutation and natural selection.
Thankyou for your pleasant response to me moneycop. Even if we do not agree about a theory, it is possible to discuss and debate and accept that other people have a different opinion, so thankyou for accepting my comment
"The senses didn't just pop out of nowhere either - look at how photosensitive cells developed over time to create the eyes..."
They didn't. A random photosensitive cell to an eyeball doesn't fit any evolutionary model.
A very interesting hub and I am bookmarking plus voting up.
Thank you for sharing.
Take care
Eiddwen.
Interesting, but the flaw is in your explanation of evolution which does not state man came from monkeys, but says that both man and chimpanzee in the past had a common anscestor to both, making a Y the bottom of the Y is a common ancestor, and the branch at the top of the Y is on one side man and on the other chimpanzee, as you can see man did not come from chimpanzee in this thoery but chimpanzee and man came from common ancestor in the past. Overall the article was good, voted up.
Moneycop, your presentation of evolution is all wrong here. For starters, evolution is no longer a theory because today there are hundreds of facts to backup this process of the gradual change in organism from one generation to the next generation. Today medical researchers understand the causes of many diseases such as "Huntington's disease", Hemophilia, etc. and have develop treatment for many of these based on evolutionary processes thru the science of genetics. Today the process of evolution can be demonstrated in labs with predictable results. I can go on and on with this.
As a matter of fact fossils of the transitional species between ape and man was recently discovered in the last couple of years and was just published in a major scientific journal this month with some very interesting implications. Some scientists are calling this a major game changer in human evolution. Anthropologists do not want to call this the missing link but the fossil does show evidence of the gradual change from ape-like creatures to more modern man on the evolutionary tree. The evolution of life is clearly defined today. The problem is many people still have a hard time accepting it when the facts are clearly documented in scientific journals and papers everyday. They simply are not reading these papers and journals.
I am glad you used the picture of the pen with the "A: it is inspiring to see the men of the world writing in the "owl project" or a literature of wisdom.
Anish
Evolution remains a theory in a desperate search for a mechanism to make it work - see my recent Hub.
The darwin theory doesn't make any sense at all.
Were is the scientific evidence behind it. Should we believe every theory that people come with. We as human beings used our sense of critism and logic sense. We let people think for us.
















Reynold Jay Level 6 Commenter 9 months ago
Sorry this doesn't work for me--however I enjoyed this very much. You have this laid out beautifully and it is easy to understand. Keep up the great HUBS. Up one and beautiful. I'm now your fan! I am working a series of 5 novels, “Seeds from Heaven” that touches on a lot of the things you mention. One might ask, “What would the Messiah’s message be today if he traveled the Earth during our time?” Book one is now published, “Lean against the Wind.”
Based upon this HUB, you might enjoy
http://hubpages.com/hub/Linda-Kolhagen-reviews-Lea